tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4451136039862948731.post8778575340868710391..comments2012-02-29T11:32:51.535-08:00Comments on macrowikinomicsbnmm: Influence and passivity in social mediamcazandehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15552190111718299690noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4451136039862948731.post-80355163492975788332012-02-29T10:40:12.453-08:002012-02-29T10:40:12.453-08:00I firmly believe social media is increasingly impo...I firmly believe social media is increasingly important for companies to be active on. As a consequence, it is furthermore essential for companies to know who is talking about your product or service and how this affects other people. With this large data created by its users, companies can adjust their business strategy. Nobody will deny the importance of an active user who is promoting the company’s product or service. Your conclusion that there is no strong correlation between popularity and influence surprised me. This is a very fascinating subject of study that is still in its infancy. Therefore, it is a good topic to research and to learn more about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4451136039862948731.post-10965018882809232182012-02-28T10:30:13.876-08:002012-02-28T10:30:13.876-08:00I think this is an interesting article, because it...I think this is an interesting article, because it has at some points a link with the article I have read: 'Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy".<br />Both articles are looking at what kind of influence people on social media can have on other social media users. But I see that their starting point is different from the other investigation. I think it is interesting to compare the research results of this article with the article I have read.<br /><br />Bryan DeclerckBryan Declerckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05273695217207523804noreply@blogger.com